Breakdown of Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald official teaser trailer



The first shot we see is a panoramic view of Hogwarts accompanied by what appears to be music reminiscent of Hedwigs Theme before several wizards and witches apparate into Hogwarts. You might be thinking: “But you can’t apparate in Hogwarts” and you would be right. This may be because Dumbledore is not headmaster and Armando Tippet is instead and he may have different rules for his own personal reasons or it could be the fact that there are no real threats in the wizarding world at this point in time considering the fact that Grindelwald has been arrested and Voldermort isn’t really Voldermort yet.

After this we see that among those aurors entering the castle is Theseus Scamander (Newt’s Brother and Leta Lestranges’ current love interest)  and also Leta Lestrange herself played by the one and only Zöe Kravitz.


Going back on the fact that these guys are aurors, we can tell that something is up. They say to a professor (who we know is Dumbledore played fantastically by Jude Law pardon the pun) that they would like to speak to them. The next thing they say is “There’s a rumor that Newt Scamander is headed to Paris”. Now this is going to be interesting. This seems to say that the MoM (Ministry of Magic) is hot on Newt’s tail (again, pardon the pun) about something, and whatever it is, its pretty serious and the MoM want it dealt with. Probably the fact that he is illegally carrying out magical creatures across the world in a suitcase and accidentally (also illegally) let them loose in New York City. I know MACUSA absolved him of those crimes but he still has the creatures back in the UK at the moment. At the same time as this is being said, we can see Newt reconstructing a postcard of Paris, the reason he is going to Paris in particular could be revealed in the writing on the back of the postcard that we can see. 

We then see a shot of somebody taking out the lights in a street with a magical device; I wonder who that could be hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm… let me think. Of course it’s Dumbledore, maybe going to meet Newt to talk to him in secret about going to Paris maybe???… This may be in secret as it could take place after Dumbledore’s ‘interrogation’ by the aurors in Hogwarts or it could just be the fact that they shouldn’t be seen talking to each other considering Newt got expelled

Next there is a small shot in London which leads up to Newt meeting Dumbledore in top of what appears to be St. Pauls Cathedral to chat sbout something, again, probably something to do with Paris.

We next see a shot of what appears to be Grindlewalds’ trial considering the way he is standing look like he is restrained by some sot of spell. But you can also say that this might not be his trial, it could be a gathering of all his followers as the woman to the right of him is defo not Picquery.

If you look at the trial of Igor Karkaroff in the Goblet of Fire, you can see that he is kept in a restraint cage, I assume that Grindelwald would be held in the same sort of thing for his trial but in this picture, it appears as though he does not have a physical restraint wound him.

It the gets to the climax of the trailer where we have Tina come up, Jacob come up, this weird bird thing come up…

and it seems as if though Jacob has been ‘unobliviated’ in a way, as he seems quite excited at the idea of going on a bit of an adventure with Newt or Newt just ‘bumped into’ him again and introduced him to the wonders of his suitcase all over again.

Then we cut to Credence on a rooftop with someone and he is expelling his obsurus from him to carry on with his life, the person standing next to him looks like a witch and could be the new love interest for Credence as she would arguably be in that case the only family that he has and he just wants a proper family.

The cut is then to the French magical association in Paris (which has a fantastic design) where we can see Queenie pop up. She is possibly there trying to find Jacob through Newt as she probably knows that Newt is in Paris with Jacob through Tina who also appears to possibly be in Paris earlier in the trailer. I would also like to point out that one of the magical animals listed on the spinning dome in the French magic ministry place is ‘Le niffleur’ which translated using my excellent French reading and writing and speaking skills means ‘The Hippogriff’ jk, it means ‘The Niffler’ which I just had to point out. #nifflers4life

We then see Leta Lestrange briefly at some random ball for a weird reason. Just thought i’d point her out.

Then we move to a slightly more interesting shot on what appears to be the white cliffs of Dover where there are three characters meeting and talking. Because it is onthe white cliffs, I assume they are wanting to talk about something rather secretive and they don’t want anybody else to hear about what they are talking about. It may be Newt and Dumbledore meeting up with somebody who provides a journey across the channel without being seen,or Newt already has the animal shown in the trailer and this mysterious guy can provide Newt with gillyweed or something like that.

We then see a man staring at a wall of what appears to be a family tree. The theory is that the full white faces are pure-bloods the half white half black faces are half-bloods and the dark faces are mudbloods/muggles. Credence is on the family tree if you look close enough. 

We then get a circus scene after this. The translated name of the circus is ‘The museum of living curiosities’ (le musée des curiosités vivantes) which makes sense given what is around the museum in what we can see from the wide shot we have. There is a quick scene of a wizard, you can learn more about him in out characters post but his name is Yusuf Kama and he is a wizard that is either French or lives in France and is tracing Newt Scamander under the orders of the MoM. There is also another quick scene where we see Newt chasing Picket through the circus and catching him. What can you do with a Bowtruckle, eh?

Next we see Credence get a bit angry and break an animal out of it’s cage with a wand or a stick or something.The next shot is a building that has exploded. Let me tell you something. NOT. THE. SAME. SCENE. You can see that the person is different,if the person isn’t and it is indeed Credence, he moved very far, very fast. I believe that this person is Grindelwald. Look at the way the person is stnading compared to the way Grindelwald is standing in his ‘trial’. We can also assume that Credence is actually in the museum at this point; if you look at the background of the room he is in, it is caged and has cloth around it, like the design of the museum that we have already seen. He may be in a caged environment also because he is an obscurus and he may be one of the displays/exhibits at the museum .

Next, a carriage pulled by Thestrals comes out of a tall tower. This is most likely the carriage which is taking Grindelwald to prison or trial or something like that. It passes us by and we see what is in my opinion the best shot in the trailer, the shot of Grindelwald in this carriage with the lightning behind him and his one white eye that is the same colour as his hair staring at two aurors who have their wands pointed at him. I assume he gets out of this and goes to a gathering of his followers for the first time in forever which is what we saw earlier in the trailer.

Then, finally straight after this we see a close up of Newt and Theseus fighting beside each other and casting a super powerful spell into the ground below that looks a bit like a shield against any spell that is cast. This is possibly the final showdown as it is shown just after Dumbledore says ‘I cannot fight Grindelwald, you must do it alone’ or, knowing the way trailers are made these days, this may take place halfway through the film.

Who knows?

The last little detail before the title is that the clouds and lightning and smoke form together to make a very familiar symbol just after the end of the trailer…

Of course we know that Grindelwald wants all the Deathly Hallows and will stop at nothing to get them, he already has the elder wand. What next?

P.S if you look closely at the title, it has all of the deathly hallows in it…


Tell me if you find all of them 🙂

Thanks for reading,

Until next time,

Stay Nifflery…

Crimes of Grindelwald Trailer

Oh snap.

If you haven’t seen the trailer for the Crimes of Grindelwald, first off; are you living under a rock and second; get the heck off the website. Jk. But… me being my kind self linked it below for the benefit of those of you who are (living under a rock that is):

Now, I don’t know about you but I’m mega hyped about this, I mean come on. Who wouldn’t be. So, in the true Niffler fan club style I’m going to tell you everything which happens and make some predictions on what is going to happen.

The first shot we see is a panoramic view of Hogwarts accompanied by what appears to be music reminiscent of Hedwigs Theme before several wizards and witches apparate into Hogwarts. You might be thinking: “But you can’t apparate in Hogwarts” and you would be right. I’m going to assume that security measures are not in place due to the fact that Grindelwald is currently under arrest or the lack of need for defenses or even the lack of ability to make defenses.  The next thing we notice is Dumbledore (Jude law) in what appears to be a classroom, probably transfiguration due to the fact that that was his profession prior to being Headmaster. When he is told that he is going to be asked a question he says “this is a surprise” suggesting previous questioning or interrogation.

“There’s a rumor that Newt Scamander is headed to Paris”. Now this is going to be interesting. The next scene is street light flicking off with what appears to be the deluminator, an object owned by Dumbledore suggesting that he himself is with Newt in Paris or that he inherited the deluminator from someone else who is. Then a shot of Paris from above leads onto the line “I know he is working under your orders” explaining the postcard and the potential appearance of Dumbledore in Paris. Then, in classic Dumbledore fasion, he says “If you’ve ever had the pleasure to teach him, you’d know Newt is not a great follower of orders” Man, he might be 50 years younger (ish) but he has always had a sense of humor. Then we cut to what appears to be Grindelwalds trial and then to Tina… I mean we all knew that was coming but Jacob is back! WOW. Excitement is off the meter.

News. News. And MORE NEWS.

Ok, right, we probably have some explaining to do. Yes, you are correct; the first half/ 3/8 of this post will be one of those apology posts. Sozzles. If you want to go to the bit after the apology click here.

You are probably asking your screen right now why the heck we haven’t uploaded in so long and you have every right to do so (if you’re not; welcome to/ welcome back to the website) and, yes, welcome back to all you fine folk who have been waiting. Thanks for the patience btdubs.

The reason we haven’t been posting recently is two things flat out- 1) Laziness. 2) There just hasn’t been anything to post about really. We have been quietly updating the main post about Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindlewald for most of the time cos there just hasn’t been much BIG news recently. Just pictures and stuff. 

I said laziness as well for one of the reasons and that is definitely a valid reason. No elaborate excuse. No cover up story. None of that. Just the real reason. Laziness. We just haven’t uploaded really. Also, Ethan and I have not had much time to upload posts and that’s a bit of the reasoning behind it. We are both relatively busy at the moment. Again, sorry.

Seriously, we want to upload more. Like, really, really, REALLY want to upload more, it may seem like the opposite but we really do; we just need a bit more time to post quality content. We don’t want to rush all of our posts and give you guys mediocre content. We want this site to be as you want and how you like it (The comments are great btw; they really help). We don’t want to give you stuff that is just plain awful and so because of this I am not going to promise new posts but I can promise one thing……… Niffler Fan Club will never be forgotten by us. It will be posted to. At least, LEAST once a month. Bare minimum. Sorry.


First off, a newsletter. A few of you have been asking for a bit of a newsletter or notifications or something for when we post or when we have updates about the life of the site and we are probably gonna put something like that together in the not so far future. We could possibly even get an app for the website that would send you push notifications for when ever we post or something. Whaddya think? Tell us. Your view is valued. 🙂 

Second, we are literally surveying, scanning, going over and over and over Pottermore, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Screen Rant, Reddit, Discord, Mashable, The Verge, Every flippin newspaper on the internet and yes, even Google+ *bleh* to find any Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes Of Grindlewald news so that we can put together another post and if we find a very small piece of info, we will just add that to the main news post/page for the film that we have. We hope to get another huge news drop at some time soon like we had in October/November/December so that we can have some huge post that mashes together all of the other posts.

Next, a very small piece of info for you; The main news post for The Crimes of Grindlewald will most likely become a page instead of a post,  considering the size of it. Almost 1,000 words. Yeesh. For a post. Dang. That’s big.

Fourth, we are going to start acting on more comments to add new features to the website from all you lovely folk out there. It really helps when we get comments from you guys about stuff we could add to the website to make it better for you. An example of one of these useful suggestion comments that has been acted on is the suggestion of the addition of social media buttons/links. Great idea! Basically, what I am trying to say is that we will try to act on these great suggestions more. Keep ’em comin’! Btw, we CANNOT add a Niffler game before any of you ask. Reasons; 

  • Copyright of the trademarked name of the Niffler
  • Copyright of the trademarked name of Fantastic Beasts®
  • Copyright of the image of the Niffler
  • The Warner Bros™ ‘Fair Use’ Copyright law (Which a game would be a breach of)
  • Using Warner Bros™ proprietary trademarked property without express permission 
  • The amount of time required
  • The amount of code needed

Cleared Up? Good. Or bad. Depending on your reaction. Anyway, if you’re not happy, tough. We don’t like going to court. We got other stuff to do than get sued by a £bn/$bn company.

Fifth and finally, we will be uploading more quizzes and fun stuff in the near future. How near this future is, we do not know yet. But it is definitely coming.

Thanks for Reading! and if you made it this far; good on you. Have a gold star! 🙂

P.S- So far there has been no more word of the Niffler spin off series. Sad times. 🙁 But we will keep looking! Seriously though. It must come. Soon. Otherwise we may go on a bit of a rant. You don’t want to be around when that happens…

The Crimes Of Grindelwald : Characters

Its that time again where we upload a new post, and boy have I got big news today!

I was trawling through the interwebs to try and find information on the latest installment of the fantastic beasts series and, while we do have a year to wait for the movie to be released, IMDb has not let us down, yet again.

With that, I present: 



It probably comes as no big surprise that Eddie Redmayne is playing Newt Scamander, as he has done and will be doing for the entire series… Hopefully. He is a really good choice of character for Newt and I’m sure he will go down in Harry Potter fandom for his role in this movie. But reader… remember his success is solely due to his reaction to the Niffler.


In this movie, its little surprise that we see the return of the infamous sisters, Tina and Queenie Goldstein played by Katherine Waterston and Alison Sudol respectively, the same as last time. I’m sure we will all find it interesting to see how their role changes in this new installment.


It seems like decades ago when we first heard those words “Theseus Scamander, The war hero?” being uttered and I’m sure that you, like me, have been waiting for the grand reveal of this character and a spin off (SAVING PRIVATE NEWT)… Yep. Well. Here he is, Callum Turner in all of his glory



Very interestingly, Credence, the flash or Ezra Miller (The Obscurial) returns in this movie. Although his role is largely unknown, I’m sure that you’re as interested as me in his role in this movie. Is he simply there for a flashback or could we see a dramatic return? All will be answered on the 18/11/17. I can’t wait that long!



And what would the “The crimes of grindelwald” be without grindelwald, portrayed by the man the myth the legend… Johnny Depp (He’s just a man… not a myth or legend… sorry for confusion). Yeah well he’s back and I can’t wait to see how he shows his character, I mean he had less than 1 minute screen time and, I think I speak for all NifflerNerds when I say… WOW. I HATE HIM SO MUCH… Good performance , seriously though.


Honorable mentions

Well I don’t have the time or effort or server storage… (Donate somehow plz <- jokes) … As I was saying, I’m gonna show a few more characters and make a brief prediction of the plot. Oh and sorry for the lack of Nifflers in this post so:

There you go. Now…

FRENCH MINISTER OF MAGIC – Sean White (I don’t know him either… Can’t wait to see his performance)

Nicolas Flamel – Brontis Jodorowsky (OH BOI – THINGS ARE HEATING UP HERE…)

Abernathy – Yep. That guy that was only used once to show Queenies “innocence”

Madame Picquery – Her royal magicness, ruler of straight lines (Carmen Ejogo)

Jacob Kowalski – No surprises here (#anamericaninparis?) Dan Fogler

Chef – Jason Redshaw

Sailor- Ryan Hannaford


Muggle – Bernardo Santos



Whats going to happen? Nobody knows but i reckon i have a pretty good guess. My concept is that, as I write, we are only one year into production. Therefore, the lists only represent the cast from the early movie. The reason I mentioned the Chef and Sailor is because in the first movie, little to no attention was placed on the boat, mainly at passport control. I believe that this will change as, after all, what could possibly be a better place to ambush Newt than in the middle of the Atlantic ocean? Why else would there be a sailor in the credits. Why else would be see Tina again than if she were to save Newt on the ship as an aurora. Well. It’s just a guess. Obviously as more material is released there will be updates to the PREDICTION.

But that’s all from me. 

All the best.




The life of our website

You know the drill; every now and then we do a slightly more serious post considering you guys and the current life of the website. This time we are asking for suggestions. More specifically comments considering the appearance of the website. Please tell us what you want us to do to the website in order to make it better for you guys. That is what we are built on. The fan base are loyal to us and we are even more loyal to the fan base (well, we try to be. But that’s near impossible 😉 ). You may have noticed that we added social media buttons to the sidebar- more specifically Twitter and Facebook. That was because of you guys commenting and asking for it. So we did it. Like I said on Twitter- any suggestions would be welcomed with open arms. Until next time……

OOOOOHHHHH, and btdubs please try not to suggest anything that will (if we do it) get us sued by the money sucking co-operation that is Warner Bros.®. Thanks. Much appreciated. We don’t like getting sued.


FBaWTFT2 news

Ok, so first thing first; we really need to get a better abbreviation for the new FB film than FBaWTFT2 (Like, really, REALLY, REALLY need one) because that just looks straight up dumb. Try saying it I’ll put it in phonetically for you: *clears throat* Fuh-Buh-Ah-Wuh-Tuh-Fuh-Tuh-To. Yeah. That. Please think of something and comment that would be muchos appreciated. Thanks.

The reason I made this post was not to rant about how hard it is to pronounce whatever that……..THING is- however entertaining that might be; I did it because there had been some new Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them 2 ® news. And the reason I didn’t just update the FBAWTFT2 post like you want me to and yes, I know that you’re thinking that this post is a waste of time but here’s why I did it here:- we have the name of two new actors who will be in the film. Not characters. ACTORS.

Now you can see why I posted it here – and if you still haven’t caught on to why – 1) PAY ATTENTION. 2) Learn to extrapolate from incomplete data (yes, exactly like the joke). 3) It’s cos it’s a very small piece of info so it really isn’t update worthy.

The 2 new actors that have been announced are Jessica Williams and Fiona Glascott and there is actually one more but we know who HE is going to play so that will be over on the page subject to updates 😏😅😉.

So we know that these are going to be two female characters (AND FOR GOODNESS SAKE DON’T JUST ASSUME BECAUSE WE ARE MAKING THE POINT THAT THEY ARE BOTH FEMALE AND CAPITALISED THE WORD ‘He’ MEANS WE ARE AGAINST WOMEN IN THIS FILM IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER – Just to get that cleared up. Now that’s over – back to the post..) So I’m guessing we might just have to wait and see; I’ll keep you guys posted (quite literally) as it goes along. Until then, PEACE!

P.S- Clue to male characters’ role- in a certain film a certain someone reads a certain book about a certain person who died on their 666th birthday…. 🍰

Sorry, sorry a million times sorry

Ok. Let’s get something cleared up. We have not been uploading much and we told you we would try more. But honestly, we are under quite a bit of pressure at the moment and we can’t make many posts so we are sorry for everything going on. So, in awe of all of this…… get ready for a post in around 20 mins. Just wait up….. tanks (mis-spell intended).



Hey guys,
This is sounding a bit repetitive now but we are really sorry about the amount of time between uploads. Hopefully it will get better and yes, Harry potter studio tour review PT.2 is coming soon(er or later).

However I think this would be a good time at ACTUALLY do: HARRY POTTER vs FANTASTIC BEASTS

The script makes up most of the movies, nearly everything that happens relies on a story. And I means there is the ever so tiny issue of the Harry Potter™ Series having 7 full stories, most of them with A LOT of pages and a very thick spine and Fantastic Beasts™ being based off of a MADE UP TEXTBOOK PUBLISHED FOR CHARITY WHERE THE SPINE IS LIKE A PINKY FINGER WIDE. Yeah. However as I’m sure you will agree, the Harry potter™ film series has a much better story-line, just remember that the Fantastic Beasts story-line is still like a little baby Niffler (assuming a little bit here…) when it still can’t rob banks and sniff gold out from a mile away, but it WILL grow and become a Niffler that can rob Swiss banks and sniff gold out from several miles away… Eh…

Harry Potter  1   |   Fantastic Beasts  0

Visual Effects
This is a tough category. We see how Harry Potter™ grows in effects over 10 years of producing. Its also worth a mention that we can all agree that some scenes with Dobby in the second film are half decent (Considering it was filmed in 2002). However Fantastic Beasts™ is pure movie magic. In that movie, it’s hard to tell real from fake. I mean just look at this: (HP philosopher stone wand scene) compared to this (FB scene). However Harry Potter™ has very little use for VFX, generally using massive budgets to make it in real life (anamatronics). So … 

Harry Potter  1   |   Fantastic Beasts  1

Giant Snakes

The fact that this is a category surprises many people… Let’s see, Basilisk vs Occamy. Um… The Occamy from Fantastic Beasts™ can fly and it’s cyshfhdjdn (insert) with, as Newt explains, means that it shrinks and/or grows to fill the available space, and it can fly. IT FLIPPIN’ FLIES. Their eggshells are made of silver and they learn to defend themselves early because poachers raid Occamy nests. It feeds on insects (as far as we know) and has a sharp beak even though it’s pretty much a snake. The small baby Occamy’s are cute, but not as cute as a Niffler… Obviously. The basilisk is DEFINITELY a snake. It has deadly poison teeth and on point hearing and it feeds on rats and mice and anything else in the chamber of secrets // the sewers (clearly Salazar Slytherin needs a better estate agent). It is killed by roosters cries and somehow can fit through pipes in a matter of seconds. Oh yeah, look at it’s eyes and you’ll die, unless it’s a reflection then you’ll be petrified for like an ENTIRE YEAR. Sheesh, you’d think st.Mungos or at least the potions supply cupboard would have some mandrakes lying around. So… I guess it’s a win for Fantastic Beasts? 

Harry Potter  1   |   Fantastic Beasts  2


Harry Potter  1   |   Fantastic Beasts  3


Well this is another tough one as, I guess, in Fantastic Beasts™ there is Grindelwald and in Harry Potter™ there is like 4 reincarnations of Voldemort but we haven’t really seen enough of Fantastic Beasts™ to to judge this fairly. It’s a close call, I mean Newt literally says, “I’m not one of Grindelwald’s fanatics” and gets the death sentence. But then again I doubt that there is one death eater that hasn’t been tortured by Voldemort, who seems to show delight in torturing and/or killing people which is grim. I guess 

Harry Potter  2   |   Fantastic Beasts  3


Well as you can see it’s pretty tight with 1 point difference. But it’s very hard to pick a winner. It’s safe to say (refering to the Niffler concept in paragraph 3) that Fantastic Beasts™ is simply not as developed as Harry Potter™ but with such a fantastic (eh.. eh..) first film from Fantastic Beasts™ (ITS ON MY TYPING SUGGESTIONS NOW *adjusts tie and clears throat* ) I think that whilst Harry potter™ just has the edge as a series, going of just the one film of Fantastic Beasts™ I think it’s safe to stay with the old conclusion and it’s a win for Fantastic Beasts™ and as a forefeit Harry Potter loses the ™ sign (don’t you “I’m gonna call the lawyers” on me… seriously though.. don’t*.) … So, what did you think? We’d love to know in the discussion section below and as new films are being made and released, will the opinion change?

By the way we’ve actually taken the ® symbol away now. It’s so oversized. So now we are just using good old ™ as it’s a lot smaller and looks more stylish. So it’s now just a normal trademark not registered one. Deal with it.

*Also if J.K Rowling is reading this- we respect all you do and all but we just cba to get a giant registered trademark symbol everytime that makes the post look…well…a bit dumb. Thanks for your cooperation 😀

Niffler spin-off series rumours (and no we are NOT joking)

As you all know we are a fan site about Nifflers and this morning I was scrolling through Twitter and I discovered something that would be very improper to not upload to the site. So here it is. LET’S GET TO IT

What I discovered on the Pottermore® Twitter page made my face light up with excitement. An article. On the Pottermore ® website titled ‘Why the Niffler should have his own spin-off series’ and I clicked on that beast of a link (which you can find right here) and I read it and read it and read it and read it and read it and the whole time I was thinking to myself ‘WHERE THE HECK IS THE FLIPPIN’ PETITION FOR THIS?’

I really enjoyed this article and I am very happy that the people who work with the extended universe of Harry Potter have finally realised the extreme response to the Niffler.

I don’t know if this might be a bit of a hint hint to something that might be in production but I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.

We’re modern now!!

Hey guys it’s now the truth that we have Social Media!!!!! So follow our Twitter account. Also, is ya feel like it follow our Facebook page have fun!!!! This also means that you 21st Century people have an excuse to go on Social media while looking at our website so you don’t have to speed read our pages anymore because you desperately want to check your Twitter/Facebook and yes all you fancy people with your Android 7.0 and iPhone 6+ and up split screens (as long as the iPhone is iPhone{x}+) must be rolling your eyes right now saying to yourselves “but I can already do that anyways! Why is he bothering with this post?” Well mister whoever you are i’ll tell you exactly why I am bothering with this post. It’s because not all of us have fancy-shmansey split-screen enabled phones! Sorry for ranting but I just knew a few people would be saying that. Ooh, by the way a little note- All links will open in a new tab.